The Side Effects of Vaccines - How High is the Risk?

  • Published: 12 May 2019
  • Sources:

    Vaccines are one of our best tools to prevent dangerous diseases, but they come with side effects. So would it be safer not to vaccinate?

    This video has been supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

    If you are interested how much sponsorships influence our videos, we wrote about that in detail here:

    Support us on Patreon so we can make more videos (and get cool stuff in return):

    Kurzgesagt Newsletter:
    Kurzgesagt Merch:

    The music of the video here:

    THANKS A LOT TO OUR LOVELY PATRONS FOR SUPPORTING US:Marsha Sohn, Henri Holler, Michelle, Dan Crowley, Alex Hackman, Sammy Mikhael, Marcus Thorén, Kevin Harris, Jayami, Andreas Poletti, David Coates, Omar Galvis, Denny Zavada, Don Knowlton, Sebastian, Jay Ruthnam, Shakira Graham, MatBu, Mikhail, Sinan Taifour, Knowledge Unlimited, Odilia Krause, Anri Digholm, Dominykas, James Gaglio, Alice Jones, Narciso Jaramillo, Qaalid Hashi, Nate Bender, Gulyás Gergely, Michael Bloch, Rick Merced, Etienne Huguenot, Jonathan Lopez, Kai Smith, Benjamin Arndt, Philip Potvin, Amy Halter, Dylan polin, Zach Evans, Karan Chawla, Michael Casey, Francis Bouchard, William Gu, peck neck, Dien Buwono, Patrick Pruitt, Alexander Isayenko, Connor Doherty, Kierr Suñega, Kongpak Phupa, Lewis Foret, Daniel Ingegneri, David Saitta, Soeren Pollerhof, Ravi Shankar, Nico Kooyman, Anna Liceva, Dan Long, ADAM M., Cruz Godar, Pedro Caetano, Jean-Pierre Girard, Jonathan Piedrasanta, Jak SP, Jim Renney, Danielle Mitchell, Giorgio Valli, Ben Evans, Bill Cohen, Gitle Mikkelsen, Gemini00, Benjamin Mahoney, Christopher DiBattista, Mandy Reid, Gary Reckard, Sataporn Chaochonpun, Bigolf, Moses Malone, Kyle Merryman, Dante Bencivenga, Zeus Laser, Jake Wise, Jade, Fontaine Liu, Manav parmar, ethnicolor

    Help us caption & translate this video!

Comments • 65 960

  • Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

    Dive into sources and further reading here:

    Vaccines and their side effects are a hard topic to cover – we know we keep saying this, but this case especially, there were a lot of things to consider. You can’t blame people for being worried, so we wanted to take their concerns seriously.

    Because it is impossible to cover everything there is to know about vaccines in a ten minute video our sources are extra extensive and explain a lot of aspects in more detail, with an extra focus on further reading.

    So if you want to dive in deeper or have more arguments at hand for your next heated discussion, here you go.

    • jsmyth024
      jsmyth024  22 hours back

      I'm sorry, but we are the sickest species ON THE PLANET. Just think about that for ONE minute.
      Our gut microbiome is being sterilized by pesticides like round up, and we are told they are safe(yes, they kill the bacteria in your gut - shocker), but DON'T WORRY, they have something you can buy for that.

      We are developing autoimmune diseases left and right. A study was just released that shows how millennials health plummets at around age 27, and no one is concerned that it's something to do with out healthcare? "healthcare" - that's a misnomer at this point.

      The SAME people that push round-up as being safe(now proven to cause cancer in a court of law), "provide" us with cancer treatments and vaccines.

      The same people who sell us vaccines, treat our children of these chronic illnesses. NO ONE is brave enough(or intelligent enough) to raise an eyebrow to that?

      Oh, wait, they are, but then they are told they are just crazy conspiracy theorists who are probably literally hitler and voted for trump. And people fall for it because it makes them FEEL safe. Meanwhile over FIFTY PERCENT of our youth(YOUTH!) have chronic illnesses that the AMA says they will NEVER recover from. And it's not enough for these mega corps to make millions or billions, now they are pushing for trillions.

      That's not fishy to you guys?

      I swear, people have thrown common sense directly out of the nearest window for, "double blind published data" We will NEVER get it. There are too many variables involved and you know this, that's why you keep asking.

      Honestly it makes me sick and people who are working for them should be ashamed of themselves. They aren't, because they have money in the bank, but one day, people are going to have had enough and they will be found and prosecuted.

      How many more of our loved ones have to suffer and die before it gets to that point?

    • frick ajit pai
      frick ajit pai  3 days back

      Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell epic

    • joel marin
      joel marin  3 days back

      thank you for making this video, its been a great help for my social justice project. I hope to use this as a source to help write my letter to a politician, (who is undecided as of writing this), I really hope to make a change and to make vaccinations more mandatory in the united states!

    • Jarley
      Jarley  2 weeks back

      Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell you forgot one thing that vaccines cause:

      adult hood
      I don’t want that happening to my children

  • Bat3p
    Bat3p  28 minutes back

    All dislikes are antivaxxers

    • Dorothy Isidro
      Dorothy Isidro  1 hours back

      Not even a single soul:
      Kurgesagt: antimates a bird which looks like a cell (that little black bird ball)

      • The World of Chachundar

        Kurzgesagt is a real fan of pokémon

        • Brinch
          Brinch  2 hours back

          I really don't believe Kurzgesagt made a clickbait title to lure in antivaxxers (even though that is a good thing). I think they're just being as honest and upfront about vaccines as they can be, so no one can see them as "one-sided", or "manipulative". They are acknowledging that there are risks.

          • Jel Gamer
            Jel Gamer  2 hours back

            Every karen ever watching this video: "Well acorrding to this website, it's bad"

            • A rare pepe
              A rare pepe  2 hours back

              Such mad lads

              *thank you.*

              • Ese Callum
                Ese Callum  3 hours back

                The appalling record of ‘Big Pharma’:
                Pharmaceutical companies have a terrible record of corporate crimes.
                "A recent study from US Public Citizen found that, since 1991, there have been
                239 legal
                settlements, totali
                ng $30.2 billion
                in federal and state penalties, levied against US
                pharmaceutical companies.
                There’s a real laundry list
                of crimes, but defrauding the
                government, hiding drug safety informat
                ion, and hawking drug
                s for purposes beyond
                which they are approved
                are the main ones. Drug companies have pledged to change, signed
                ‘corporate integrity agreements’ and indicated that they want to move on, promising a better
                future. We can be hopeful, but we also have to be
                realistic. Paying huge fines for illegal activity
                is one thing, but will they be
                still playing the eminence game? W
                ill they continue to fund their
                own experts and do research that goes through a selective reporting of ‘the evidence’? Sadly,
                that’s probably going to be the case so you must immunise yourself: keep asking questions and
                questioning answers." (10)
                Recently Forbes magazine concluded that the pharmaceutical industry is ‘
                addicted to
                Merck is being sued by its own scientists
                over a raft of frauds
                relating to its
                MMR vaccine
                . (20) The list of alleged frauds is fa
                r-ranging including failing to disclose a
                reduced efficacy, using ‘improper testing techni
                ques’, manipulation of testing methodologies,
                falsifying test data, with holding data, and forgery of compliance documents. This kind of
                behavior has become entirely common in the pharmaceutical industry.
                Issues with risk minimization:
                Correct risk minimization approaches are often inverted, with consumers and
                independent researchers expected to definitively prove harm, rather than the onus being on the
                product provider to firmly establish safety. The ‘P
                recautionary Principle’ – ‘if in doubt leave it
                out’ – has been largely bypassed, and the terms of reference inverted.
                Pharmaceutical companies have positioned themselves so that policy makers often feel
                constricted in holding them to the same levels of risk minimization as other industries, due to the
                perception that they may forego important research, or cease delivering other effective products
                if their operations are subjected to
                greater scrutiny and bureaucracy.
                Negative effects of pharmaceutical products are often diffused in the wider community,
                and not always easy to quantify due to inadequate reportage and monitoring. Unlike an airline
                disaster which has a very immediate consequence, the negative effects of a particular
                pharmaceutical product may be less discernable,
                especially if the effects are more long term.
                Most people would agree that if a disease usually has a very low mortality rate, any
                vaccine intended to prevent it must be unequivo
                cally safe and effective. Proper risk assessments
                are made difficult by the lack of robust monitoring of adverse events; the suppression of
                independent science, the with holding of clinical data, and myriad other issues mentioned in this
                No scientific research has been conducted comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated
                populations, in terms of overall,
                long term health outcomes.
                Call for reform and greater transparency:
                The dealings of the pharmaceutical industry in Australia appear to be largely exempt
                from Freedom of Information requests, and there is a lack of transparency surrounding possible
                Conflict of Interest situations on advisory bodies. Dr Whitely has also called for mandatory
                reporting of serious adverse events, and break ou
                t boxes on products warning of possible serious
                side effects. (4)
                So far calls to bring the industry in line with
                the expectations of other industries have
                been largely ignored.
                Issues with the applicatio
                n of ‘informed consent’:
                The principle of ‘informed consent’ requires that patients be informed of all risks and
                benefits associated with any medical procedure, and that a decision be made free from coercion.
                In an environment where pharmaceutical marketing, the media, and various ‘attack ‘ groups
                hystericise the general population and vilify critics and independent researchers, the notion of
                ‘informed consent’ has become problematic. Consumers clearly feel pressurized.
                Linking the decision to vaccinate to the provision of childcare available to everyone else,
                further complicates this. It can be argued that such
                policy enters a grey area in terms of informed
                Vaccination providers also seem reluctant to provide consumers with information on
                possible adverse effects. Many maintain the narrative that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ in all
                instances, despite package inserts clearly outlining possible adverse effects. An audit of how
                vaccination providers approach ‘informed consent’ is urgently needed.
                Unresolved liability issues:
                As the parents of Saba Button - who was permanently injured by a flu shot - found there
                is a lack of clarity when it comes to liability.
                (15) Australia is one of only three Western nations
                that does not have a vaccine injury compensation scheme despite the World Health Organisation
                arguing it is an ‘ethical necessity’. In the case of an injury there is no clear indication of who
                takes responsibility.
                If the parents of a vaccine injured child feel their decision to vaccinate was prompted by
                government policy, does the government take responsibility if their child is injured as a result? It
                would appear not. Pharmaceutical companies and vaccination providers also seem to avoid
                liability. This question requires immediate clar
                ification. Currently there is a policy void
                surrounding issues of lia
                bility and compensation.

                • Ese Callum
                  Ese Callum  3 hours back

                  Mobilizing patient and consumer gr
                  oups to represent their interests.
                  Manipulating a compliant media, which is at times compromised by conflicts of interest,
                  especially at an executive level where a cross
                  pollination occurs with ph
                  armaceutical interests
                  occurs.(16) They also exploit the quick turnaround in the media which can mitigate against in
                  depth research.
                  Lobbying policy makers and opinion leaders.
                  Selective use of statistics. For example globa
                  l statistics on disease mortality are often
                  used to panic policy makers in Western nations.
                  Issues with nutrition, hygiene and so forth in
                  some ‘third world’ nations may play a significan
                  t role in mortality figures for diseases which
                  have low mortality in robust individuals in Western nations.
                  An ‘all of nothing’ approach that lumps all vaccine /disease combinations together, and
                  leverages the most extreme disease threats to compel compliance with a vaccine based approach
                  to those with low mortality. The ‘pro/anti’ dual
                  ism is also used to sideline and discredit anyone
                  who presents critical research of a particular product.
                  Aside from pharmaceutical marketing there is a more complex and less easily understood
                  phenomenon involving groups and individuals that present themselves as being pro ‘science’ or
                  more specifically pro vaccination. They often ta
                  ke it upon themselves to run campaigns against
                  individuals or groups that they perceive as bein
                  g critical of vaccination. Their tactics can be
                  crude but effective, and at times of questionable legality. They can include:
                  Cyber bullying and threats.
                  Disinformation campaigns including misrepresenting research.
                  Making spurious complain
                  ts to academic institution
                  s and professional bodies.
                  Disseminating fictitious personal information designed to cause embarrassment or a loss
                  of credibility.
                  Using seemingly authoritative or popular
                  websites to launch attacks designed to
                  hystericise consumers, and ostracize critics. In some instances the wording can be considered
                  ‘hate speech’ and adds to an atmosphere of fear surrounding this issue.
                  One of the world’s most awarded journalists Sharyl Atkisson describes this as the ‘astro
                  turf’ movement. She has researched the tactics used by pharmaceutical concerns and their allies
                  to silence the very many researchers from eminent Universities who are critical of their products.
                  “.....if the propagandists are to be believed, each of the researchers is an incompetent crank,
                  quack, nut or fraud (and, of course, “anti-vaccin
                  e” for daring to dabble in research that........
                  leads to vaccine safety
                  issues). The scientists and their re
                  search are “controversial,” simply
                  because the propagandists declare them to be........“Weak,” “too small,” “haphazard,” “not
                  replicated,” “junk science,” “flawed,” “unrelated,” declare the propagandists, without exception.
                  Just as attackers spent years challenging any study that linked tobacco to lung cancer.
                  They know that
                  reporters who don’t do their homework
                  will conduct an Internet search, run
                  across the blogs with science-y sounding names, and
                  uncritically accept their word as if it’s
                  and prevailing thought.” (17)
                  Pharmaceutical marketing leverages off a kind of religious fervor that surrounds this
                  issue. Dr Jefferson has said that ‘
                  vaccines have become like a religion
                  ... something you don’t
                  question. If you do, you are seen as being an anti-vaccine extremist. The authorities do not want
                  to hear ‘side-effect’(18)

                  • Ese Callum
                    Ese Callum  3 hours back

                    Correlative studies:
                    Correlative studies cannot be considered definitive, but in conjunction with other research
                    they often indicate areas that require further examination. There has so far not been an
                    exhaustive and independent study comparing more general health outcomes between vaccinated
                    and non vaccinated children. Can we definitively
                    say we are not trading one health issue for
                    A report in ‘Human and Experimental Toxicology’ stated:
                    "Our findings show
                    a positive correlation
                    between the
                    number of vaccine doses
                    and the
                    percentage of hospitalisations and deaths
                    "? (12)
                    And, "the US childhood vaccination schedule has 26 doses for infants aged less than 1
                    year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better Infant Mortality Rates......
                    Nations that
                    require more vaccine doses tend to ha
                    ve higher infant mortality rates
                    A Spanish research team concluded that, “vaccines containing adjuvants may be
                    associated with an
                    increased risk of autoimmune/inflammatory adverse events
                    Regulation and monitoring:
                    In a submission to parliament Dr Martin Whitely, senior advocate for the Western
                    Australian Health Consumers Council stated:
                    “When licensing drugs for marketing Australia
                    ’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
                    relies on research funded and controlled by pharmaceutical companies. Too often pharmaceutical
                    companies ‘
                    cherry pick’ favorable evidence and hide or ‘spin’ unfavorable evidence
                    support their commercial interests.” (4)
                    Most vaccination proponents will argue that
                    serious adverse reactions are rare, but a big
                    problem is that we do not have accurate, agreed upon figures. During the height of the flu
                    vaccine adverse reactions in 2010 Peter Collignon, a professor of infectious diseases from the
                    Australian National University, was
                    interviewed by ABC news. He felt
                    the number of adverse
                    reactions was probably under estimated
                    , given that authorities don’t have a congruent and
                    approachable system to monitor peoples’ reactions. He believed that an effective surveillance
                    system should monitor a sample group of thousands for one or two weeks before a new vaccine
                    is rolled out for the entire population. "We need a better system than voluntary notification to the
                    TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) that there's a problem," he said. "Because whenever
                    you do that you really underestimate how much of a problem there is. (15)
                    Dr. Whitely has argued that there needs to be mandatory reporting of adverse events. (4)
                    Without agreed upon figures for adverse events an accurate risk analysis cannot be undertaken,
                    and we are unable to state whether the current schedule of vaccinations is in fact safe, or creating
                    more negative health outcomes than
                    it is intended to prevent.
                    Tactics used by pharmaceutical
                    companies to silence dissent:
                    “Pharmaceutical companies are master manipulators.....”, Dr Whitely has stated. “They
                    pull the wool over the eyes of drug safety regulators everywhere”. (4) They use a range of tactics
                    which can include:
                    Controlling the medical evidence base via influencing clinical trial guidelines; ‘ghost
                    writing’ articles for journals; selectively releasin
                    g data, and selectively marketing trial results.
                    Utilizing ‘Key Opinion Leaders’ who often have undue influence upon policy – a
                    problem the independent Cochrane Collaboration refers to as ‘Eminence Based Medicine’.(10)
                    Maintaining a barrage of websites and blogs that purport to support ‘science’, but embed
                    their marketing objectives.
                    Embedding their marketing in established news and information websites.
                    Undertaking virulent campaigns to discredit researchers who question their products.
                    Terms such as ‘junk science’, ‘questionable’, ‘not
                    evidence based’, and many more are routinely
                    used in attempts to discredit researchers who threaten their profit margins.
                    Maintaining a small army of internet trolls to present the interests of pharmaceutical
                    companies in online discussion forums, the comments sections of articles, and any other area
                    where they can present their views.

                    • Ese Callum
                      Ese Callum  3 hours back

                      If you bought a new car and there was only a one in twelve chance that it would work
                      properly, how would you feel? And what if there was a one in three chance that it was downright
                      dangerous? Faced by these sorts of statistics, most consumers would be furious. And yet
                      according to an article in the ‘Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics’, entitled ‘Institutional
                      Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs’ this may well be the
                      state of affairs with pharmaceutical products.. The
                      “.....proportion of new products with
                      clinical advantages seems to have moved from about 1 in 8 down to 1 in 12, while the
                      proportion with serious harms has gone up from 1 in 5 towards 1 in 3
                      ......" (9)
                      Dr Tom Jefferson of the independent Cochrane Collaboration has undertaken
                      comprehensive reviews of some vaccines. According to his findings the ‘flu vaccine for example
                      showed “
                      no effect on specific outcomes:
                      laboratory-proven influenza, pneumonia, or deaths
                      from pneumonia”. .In other words, the flu vaccine policy, ‘while eminently agreeable, is
                      unsupported by evidence that has been systematically collected, critically evaluated, and
                      properly synthesised.’ He is wary of the ‘trust us, we’re experts’ pose taken by many policy
                      makers. He states that ‘in my opinion,
                      that response is only fit for underlings, not intelligent,
                      responsible healthcare workers facing th
                      e pointy end of a syringe this season
                      . (10)
                      It is also worth pondering the words of immunologist Dr Tetyana Obukhanych, author of
                      ‘Vaccine Illusion’
                      “I am very concerned that “immunologic memory” of adjuvant-containing vaccines is actually
                      the basis of sensitization rather
                      than the basis of immunity.
                      Furthermore, I am very concerned that “successful” prevention of childhood diseases by means
                      of short-term protective effects of live attenuated viral vaccines during childhood has led to the
                      loss of maternal ability to transfer immuno-protection to their young, thereby leaving infants
                      vulnerable to those diseases, should the exposure occur.
                      I am also very concerned that vaccination campaigns work by disrupting disease transmission,
                      which reduces the chances of exposure, rather than by establishing a population’s immunity. By
                      doing so,
                      vaccination campaigns wipe out populati
                      on’s immunity to childhood diseases
                      rather than help to maintain it.
                      If in prior decades there was naturally established herd
                      immunity to childhood diseases among the adult po
                      pulation, then I am af
                      raid that vaccination
                      campaigns have ensured that it is long gone.
                      All of this is a direct outcome of the “desired” vaccination effects, the impact of which hasn’t
                      been carefully thought through in advance of introducing mass vaccination.
                      We thought that
                      vaccines work just like natural immunity. We
                      ll, apparently they
                      don’t and we are now
                      reaping the consequences of that.”

                      • 9 year old soldier
                        9 year old soldier  3 hours back

                        Anti-vax kids:*Turns 3*
                        Anti-vax parents:*Grabs coffin* get the fu*k in here

                        • Ese Callum
                          Ese Callum  3 hours back

                          Dozens of academic papers and media articles have been reviewed and inputs received
                          from immunologists, geneticists, epidemiologists, and various other medical professionals, as
                          well as government officials, journalists, risk minimization experts and ethicists globally and
                          locally. A large amount of supporting information can be supplied if required.
                          This paper will look at how the medical ev
                          idence base has been almost completely
                          compromised by pharmaceutical marketing concer
                          ns; how the selective release of data skews
                          results, and how this is used to mislead policy makers, the medical community and the general
                          It will look at evidence th
                          at some vaccine products and ingredients are implicated in
                          neurological harm, autoimmune dysfunction, and other negative health outcomes.
                          It will present a case that the Australian m
                          odel of regulation and monitoring is far from
                          adequate, and issues of liab
                          ility have been largely overlooked. Correct risk minimization
                          processes have been inverted, and a lack of transparency has been identified in key areas.
                          It will also look at the media bias surroundi
                          ng this issue, and the techniques used by
                          pharmaceutical marketing and its allies to suppre
                          ss independent journalism and science. It will
                          touch upon the appalling record of pharmaceutical companies which includes many instances of
                          fraud, bribery, intimidation and deliberate negligence.
                          This paper is not intended to be in any way definitive, but it is meant to give a brief
                          overview of the case for policy change, and an urgent review of how pharmaceutical interests
                          operate in this country.
                          Contamination of the medical evidence base:
                          In 2002 the editor of the Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, claimed that around 90% of clinical
                          guidelines are being written by people with financial links to pharmaceutical companies. Since
                          then it has been revealed that articles in
                          medical journals are being ‘ghost written’ by
                          pharmaceutical employees, and that data is being routinely with held.
                          "Horton declared, “
                          Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue
                          Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and
                          flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of
                          dubious importance,
                          science has taken a turn towards darkness
                          .” (1)
                          The work of Dr Peter Doshi and the independent Cochrane Collaboration should give us
                          pause for thought.
                          “The current system....... is one in which the me
                          ager details of clinical trials published in
                          medical journals, often by authors with financial ties to the companies whose drugs they are
                          writing about,
                          is insufficient to the point of being misleading
                          The industry has not been slow to respond.
                          "The pharmaceutical industry has "mobilised" an army of patient groups to lobby against plans to
                          force companies to publish secret documents on drugs trials.
                          Drug companies publish only a
                          fraction of their results
                          and keep much of the information to
                          themselves, but regulators want to ban the practice. If companies published all of their clinical
                          trials data, independent scientists could re analyse their results and check companies' claims
                          about the safety and efficacy of drugs." (3)
                          The much vaunted medical evidence base is in a bad state of disrepair. As Dr Marcia
                          Angell, a former editor for the New England Journal of Medicine states,
                          It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,
                          to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no
                          pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an
                          editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. "(4)
                          Adverse events following vaccination:
                          Vaccine manufacturers acknowledge a range of adverse reactions in their product
                          disclosure information, and there are over forty acknowledged vaccine induced adverse events.
                          (5) There is no doubt that vaccines can cause harm, and even death, in some instances. So
                          regardless of what anyone may make of individual research papers the fact is that there is
                          agreement that vaccination is never entirely safe. There can be risks involved. And efficacy rates
                          There are a large amount of research papers discussing possible harm from vaccines
                          and/or specific ingredients. The senior post doctoral researchers in vaccine safety at the
                          University of British Columbia Professor Chris Sh
                          aw and Dr Lucija Tomijanovic have presented
                          many papers on the deleterious effects of vaccine adjuvants. They have investigated the
                          mechanisms of aluminium based adjuvants in paed
                          iatric populations and concluded that children
                          have an immune system that is a work in progress, and is far more susceptible to harmful side
                          effects. Their
                          ‘observations raise plausible concerns about the overall safety of current
                          childhood vaccination programs.’
                          “Infants and young children should not be viewed as ‘‘small adults.’’ Their unique
                          physiology makes them much more vulnerab
                          le to noxious environmental insults in
                          comparison with the adult population.
                          In spite of this, children are routinely exposed to much
                          higher levels of Al vaccine adjuvants th
                          an adults, even though adequate safety
                          data on these compounds are lacking.
                          That Al vaccine adjuvants can induce significant
                          autoimmune conditions in humans
                          can hardly be disputed, a
                          lthough still debatable is how
                          common such side effects are. However, the existing data (or lack thereof) raise questions on
                          whether the current vaccines aimed at pediatric populations can be accepted as having adequate
                          safety profiles. Because infants and children represent those who may be most at risk for
                          complications following vaccination,
                          a more rigorous evaluation of potential vaccine-related
                          adverse health impacts in pediatric populations
                          than what has been provided to date is
                          urgently needed.”
                          Tomijanovic states, ‘
                          Physicians should adopt a more rigorous evidence-based
                          in order to provide a balanced and objective evaluation of vaccine risks and
                          benefits to their patients’ (7)
                          They also concluded that
                          “ spite of the widespread agreement that vaccines
                          largely safe and serious adverse complications are extremely rare, a close scrutiny of the
                          scientific literature does not support this view.”(
                          Professor Yehuda Shoenfeld spoke in Australia in 2013. He has investigated how
                          aluminum based adjuvants can trigger auto immune dysfunction if a genetic predisposition
                          exists. There is widespread acceptance of his finding that
                          aluminium adjuvants can cause
                          catastrophic auto im
                          mune dysfunction
                          (8). He has identified key genetic markers indicative of
                          a predisposition towards adverse events, and yet little work seems to be being done identifying
                          individuals who may be at risk.
                          Australia is currently experiencing what
                          politician Bill Shorten described as an
                          ‘epidemic’ of broad spectrum neurological dysfun
                          ctions, so if there is the slightest possibility
                          that Professor Shaw, Shoenfeld et al are correct, we need to be looking at what other countries
                          are doing in this regard. In 2014 France held
                          an open enquiry into the issue of aluminium
                          adjuvants. So far Australia has avoided looking
                          at this issue, or conducting any transparent
                          enquiry into the side effects of vaccination.

                          • jimmy jimster
                            jimmy jimster  3 hours back

                            if you take in consideration how if you dont take vaccines it could lead to alot more deaths than taking the vaccines

                            • Melvin Yellow
                              Melvin Yellow  3 hours back

                              Not true, don’t listen. It’s a fact that autosm causes vaccines

                              • Artemis420
                                Artemis420  2 hours back

                                Melvin Yellow 😂😂😂 I was about to get so mad

                            • ABYSS WATCHERS
                              ABYSS WATCHERS  3 hours back

                              those anti vaxxers wont learn unless they have caused an outbreak that their beloved child is one of the casualties. well stupid people always learn it the hard way i guess.

                              • A wild Spitfire
                                A wild Spitfire  4 hours back

                                I bet 3/4 views are from anti vaxxers

                                • Dominik Mandic
                                  Dominik Mandic  4 hours back

                                  Things that never get old

                                  1.Dark Humor
                                  2.Complaining about school😫
                                  3.Unvaccined kids

                                  • Catte Official
                                    Catte Official  4 hours back

                                    I'm sorry. But you've gotten the disease called being alive.
                                    Like how do you people think that vaccines are bad?

                                    • panggop jio
                                      panggop jio  5 hours back

                                      got over the issue and can now be vaccinated.

                                      • Artemis420
                                        Artemis420  2 hours back

                                        panggop jio good for you 🙏🏼💪🏼

                                    • TheManiac Gaming
                                      TheManiac Gaming  6 hours back

                                      Side effect: Small children start screaming that they don't want to get a shot and then they don't even know when they did it. XD

                                      • Smitty Fan
                                        Smitty Fan  8 hours back

                                        I had to go to the ER due to a severe allergic reaction from getting immunized. My mom thinks it was probably the MMR one, in fact. Since then, she stopped immunizations, and interestingly, I have had fewer ear infections since then. Also, the time my dad decided to get a free flu shot at work, he got super sick with the flu for about two weeks afterward. I have a friend whose daughter died because she was given an accidental overdose on her immunizations. Immunizations are not perfect. Everyone's body is different and reacts differently. They work great for some, but not so great for others. People's genetics sometimes play a factor, even. The amount of required immunizations and drugs given to kids has increased over the years. Ironically, the number of kids with autism and other serious mental health issues and diseases have also increased over the years too. It does make one wonder...

                                        • Thomas Wadsworth
                                          Thomas Wadsworth  2 hours back

                                          +Smitty Fan your first answer almost sounded plausible but then this comment shows really you were using a fake story to push an agenda, because now your just throwing all this "fact" around to support something you clearly believe in rather than initially your just pondering based on lack of knowledge which is ok to do btw. Until it turns dangerous and you harm other people

                                        • Vary Olla
                                          Vary Olla  5 hours back

                                          So rather than sticking to the facts = you simply go off on even more unrelated tangents which again do not reflect reality.  Who's a thunk it. 

                                          1 - the daughter could have conceivably died from a variety of things.  Vaccine overdose is not among them as it is a nonexistent condition.
                                          2 - it is sadly apparently you not only do not understand the ingredients of vaccines = you apparently lack even a rudimentary understanding of science in general and basic chemistry in particular.
                                          3 - formaldehyde is a naturally occurring substance in the human body.  Your body produces it all the time as it is used as a precursor in a variety of metabolic functions to include DNA formation. In the human body it is rapidly broken down into formic acid which is then excreted via the kidneys.  So what makes it dangerous - and by the way commercial formaldehyde such as is used for embalming fluid contains a host of other chemicals beside formaldehyde - is if that formic acid accumulates in the body to dangerous levels.  In a child with normal renal functioning however that does not happen and thus a child will at any given time have 50-70X the level of naturally occurring formaldehyde in their body than the residual microscopic amounts that may be found in some vaccines.
                                          4 - aluminum such as is Alum which is used for adjuvant is not the same as the aluminum found in your toaster = nonsensical equivalency.  It is not a "heavy metal" either.  The aluminum *SALT* that is used as adjuvant is the same as can be found in a myriad of foodstuffs and is an ingredient in baking powder.  It is a water-soluble analog of the Aluminum atom = and anyone who understands chemistry knows that an analog is chemically different and thus it metabolizes differently based upon it's chemical composition.  
                                          5 - Aluminum is ubiquitous in human food being naturally occurring as it is one of the most common elements on the planet.  Plants absorb it from the soil as they take in nutrients = while animals eat the plants and humans eat both.  So the average person ingests - and absorbs - vastly more aluminum via their cumulative intake than they could conceivably be exposed to in a lifetime of vaccination.
                                          6 - lastly the idiocy about mixing DNA.  Ever catch the Flu perchance??  H1N1 - or swine Flu - is called that because the strain originated in pigs.  Accordingly the virus contains both human and porcine DNA = which means anyone who catches it now has that swine DNA replicating in their body.  Any time you consume a natural foodstuff or protein = you are ingesting "foreign" DNA.  Eat a hamburger = bovine DNA.  Eat some fish = fish DNA. 

                                          So I will leave you with this cautionary tale.  Wherever you are getting this pseudo-scientific nonsense from = find a new source of information as what you are posting here is frankly silly.  Have a nice day.

                                        • Smitty Fan
                                          Smitty Fan  6 hours back

                                          I'm basing on personal experience. I reacted. My friend's daughter died. My dad got sick afterward. Aluminum, formaldehyde and animal and human biologic waste products are a few of the primary ingredients in many vaccines. Formaldehyde is a carcinogen. Something that causes death, by the way. Formaldehyde is also in cigarettes, so does this mean smoking is totally healthy too? Aluminum is a metal. Metals, (aluminum and tin) in particular when ingested, can cause blood poisoning and toxicity. My oldest brother has severe metal allergies. He cannot wear watches without breaking out in hives. Even if they have a leather band. He is 14 years older than me and lives a ways away, so I don't see him much and wasn't there when he was growing up, but my mom says he was always reacting to his immunizations. Hives, swelling, ear infections, rashes, feeling sick, nauseous, headaches, high fevers, etc. Nasty stuff. Lastly, all humans and animals have their own unique genetic DNA make-up. When you start mixing DNA of other people and animals back and forth it can cause serious mental, physical and neurological problems. Not to mention, all the artificial hormones and chemicals we pump into animals to make them grow how we want them to. Those hormones don't just leave the animals and can still be present in the vaccines.

                                        • Vary Olla
                                          Vary Olla  7 hours back

                                          1 - it is physically impossible to "overdose" on vaccines = nonsensical statement.
                                          2 - while allergic reactions to vaccines are possible = they are exceedingly rare.  Meanwhile an allergic reaction is not the fault of the vaccine = it rather denotes some idiopathic problem with the individual resulting in a sensitivity.  Vaccine ingredients are chosen from commonly used commercial ingredients which have been in use for many years with a long track record of safety.  So despite our best efforts - while >90% of people tolerate vaccines - there will always be a small number who may be allergic to something for some reason.
                                          3 - ear infections (otitis media) are caused by bacteria and have nothing to do with vaccination.  Vaccines do not protect you from the bacteria which commonly cause ear infections in children.
                                          4 - the Flu vaccine (and vaccines in general) typically takes 1-2 weeks after you were vaccinated for your body to develop immunity.  Meanwhile some people develop side effects from vaccination which can mimic what the condition causes because the virus in the vaccine stimulates an immune response = and those symptoms when you get sick are actually your immune system fighting off an invading pathogen.  So a person who gets say the Flu vaccine - then claims they got the Flu a few days later = either was already exposed to the Flu at the time they were vaccinated or else are conflating the side effects from having the Flu - which they do not.  The vaccine does not give you the Flu while your immune system is still mobilizing it's defenses a few days post-vaccination.

                                          So facts matter here.  What you have posted either does not reflect the science - or else you are conflating things to rationalize what you apparently want to believe.  Learn the actual science = and stick to it.  Have a nice day.

                                      • kropotk1n
                                        kropotk1n  8 hours back

                                        Люди, кому интересно на моём канале есть русская озвучка этого видео

                                        • Chime Rift
                                          Chime Rift  14 minutes back

                                          Не русский, и я не говорю по - русски, но спасибо.

                                      • Parry Home
                                        Parry Home  9 hours back

                                        My dad was vaccinated, his hair started greying, so bad he had to remove it and got a bad back! This is because he is old

                                        • Sanhinda Peiris
                                          Sanhinda Peiris  9 hours back

                                          R.I.P dead kids

                                          • Paskal Sitepu
                                            Paskal Sitepu  10 hours back

                                            * seeing 3:06 *
                                            me: *extreme wheezing*

                                            • Marco Pohl
                                              Marco Pohl  11 hours back

                                              "8% will get serious diarrhea" well shit!

                                              • Potatoe Man96
                                                Potatoe Man96  11 hours back

                                                *karen stop playing the boss music he hears it*

                                                • Intellectual Canine
                                                  Intellectual Canine  12 hours back

                                                  bruh if you get vaccinated you'd still die in 100 years 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

                                                  • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                    Kaata Furgenduter  10 hours back

                                                    +xealen dammit

                                                  • xealen
                                                    xealen  10 hours back

                                                    +Kaata Furgenduter its a joke

                                                  • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                    Kaata Furgenduter  12 hours back

                                                    I'm not sure if I'm getting r/wooshed or you're just a dumb antivaxxer.

                                                • David Perry
                                                  David Perry  13 hours back

                                                  Oh yea I know all about this I watch Cells At Work, amazing Anime 👌🏾

                                                  • Joshua Dixon
                                                    Joshua Dixon  14 hours back

                                                    Oh no no no no don’t tell me your anti-vax

                                                    • Lorenza Semaj McCoy Jr.
                                                      Lorenza Semaj McCoy Jr.  14 hours back

                                                      Man the part starting at around 1:00 should be a RTS game lol!

                                                      • Thomas Keller
                                                        Thomas Keller  15 hours back

                                                        Thank yo for making this I hate anti vaxxers with the passion for murder and I think they are just too dumb to get it through there head that vaccines are good. It's like using a spoon to did out of prison

                                                        • 신동범
                                                          신동범  15 hours back

                                                          like how do people actually believe vaccines are bad?

                                                          • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                            Kaata Furgenduter  12 hours back

                                                            I agree. But if you're in the Philippines, I don't blame you if you can't trust the government. After all, The Philippines in one of the most, if not the most corrupt country in Asia.

                                                        • Huong Nguyen
                                                          Huong Nguyen  15 hours back

                                                          Dude just do the insert the memory cells in your body and do vaccines later

                                                          • Ronnie ́s HQ
                                                            Ronnie ́s HQ  16 hours back

                                                            Vaccines side effects that cause death:
                                                            Those are all let me know if i missed one!

                                                          • Budderguy
                                                            Budderguy  16 hours back

                                                            Car has a 0.00001% of blowing up.

                                                            Karen: You guys should not be driving it is dangerous and walking is better

                                                            • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                              Kaata Furgenduter  12 hours back

                                                              +Whirlwind12 GMD ikr. I don't eat at all. It's really dangerous.

                                                            • Whirlwind12 GMD
                                                              Whirlwind12 GMD  14 hours back

                                                              it is dangerous to drive a car, and you shouold be walking, it is exercise. Change it to -
                                                              If you eat you can choke, so lets all never eat!

                                                          • erel Gililov
                                                            erel Gililov  17 hours back

                                                            Antivaxx kid

                                                          • n99cents m
                                                            n99cents m  17 hours back

                                                            Thank god my family got vaccinated. Also my neighbor had a child that could not recieved vaccines due to medical problems and we had to use herd immunity. Luckily the child got over the issue and can now be vaccinated.

                                                            • ExoticCraft
                                                              ExoticCraft  18 hours back

                                                              Wow why all the hate??? 7.5k dislikes 😐

                                                            • Yung Chubbz
                                                              Yung Chubbz  18 hours back

                                                              Lies. My nephew was fine, but one round of vaccines, and he's autistic. Don't know which one, but that flu shot is the 1 I will NOT give my children. It's the 1 I never got.

                                                              • Artemis420
                                                                Artemis420  2 hours back

                                                                As people have said, autism isn’t something you get, it’s something you ARE. Autism shows it’s symptoms at the same time as the MMR vaccine. The flu shot is harmless most people have it EVERY YEAR. I personally don’t get the flu shot because I’m allergic to something in it, but I really hope you do, because your unvaccinated kids could fucking kill me.

                                                              • sea shells
                                                                sea shells  2 hours back

                                                                You should vaccinate since funerals are much more expensive.

                                                              • James Pelletier
                                                                James Pelletier  4 hours back

                                                                Autism is a mental disorder. You are born with it, you can't catch it

                                                              • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                                Kaata Furgenduter  11 hours back

                                                                Did you know, a kid died 2 weeks after getting that flu shot?

                                                                I killed him.
                                                                I told the cops that it's the vaccine's fault but they didn't believe me. What do I do?

                                                              • Whirlwind12 GMD
                                                                Whirlwind12 GMD  14 hours back

                                                                Autism is a literally unnoticeable inconvenience in life, and people are born autistic. It is just time coincidence that he got autism at the time.

                                                            • Andrej Cupac
                                                              Andrej Cupac  18 hours back

                                                              Wow. Thought this was a discussion where ya have both sides and not just bias. Still a decent video tho

                                                              • Artemis420
                                                                Artemis420  2 hours back

                                                                Andrej Cupac yeah, as the comment above me said, facts are not opinions and they can’t be biased. Because they’re facts.

                                                              • James Pelletier
                                                                James Pelletier  4 hours back

                                                                Facts aren't bias

                                                              • Kaata Furgenduter
                                                                Kaata Furgenduter  11 hours back

                                                                It's not biased if they're presenting facts. It's biased if they're only presenting the facts that when taken out of context, it supports their beliefs.

                                                              • Whirlwind12 GMD
                                                                Whirlwind12 GMD  14 hours back

                                                                It's not bias if its true and there are literally millions of articles saying it's true

                                                            • Matthew Mendez
                                                              Matthew Mendez  19 hours back

                                                              oh well.nevermind.

                                                              • The Youtube Admin
                                                                The Youtube Admin  19 hours back

                                                                Are we missing the extra tension of dying diseases that could be eliminated by vaccines?

                                                                • song song
                                                                  song song  20 hours back

                                                                  I dislike because I don't understand but I know my family got vaxx I asked my dad

                                                                • ThelastRack YT
                                                                  ThelastRack YT  20 hours back

                                                                  The 7000 dislikes were all from anti-vaxxers who got clickbaited an educated

                                                                  • Para dox
                                                                    Para dox  20 hours back

                                                                    Perfect. Now do religion please !

                                                                    • Ese Callum
                                                                      Ese Callum  21 hours back

                                                                      Make Educated Decisions

                                                                      Before making a decision on vaccinating your children against anything, I strongly urge you review the side effects and risks involved. Making this effort could make a tremendous difference in the health of your child.

                                                                      Remember: Vaccines can cause serious health problems including brain inflammation and autoimmune disorders, allergies, ear infections, and more
                                                                      There's a very real association between vaccine complications and learning and behavioral disorders in children
                                                                      The components of vaccines have never been proven safe
                                                                      The ingredients and contaminants in vaccines can be detrimental to your health

                                                                      There are far safer and more effective ways to protect your children and yourself against disease. For example, a Japanese study from last year showed that school children taking vitamin D3 supplements were 58 percent less likely to catch influenza A. That's a higher effectiveness than any flu vaccine can claim, and doesn't come with a barrage of potentially devastating side effects!

                                                                      There are numerous studies like these, showing the superior effectiveness of natural strategies in the prevention of disease.

                                                                      Overall, your best defense against any disease is a robust immune system, which vaccines can compromise. So supporting your immune system should always be at the top of your list. Vitamin D is one crucial component for optimal health, so I urge you to get your children's vitamin D levels tested, and, if found deficient, to follow my recommendations for optimizing their levels.

                                                                      Do this, and they'll be less likely to catch a cold or flu this year.

                                                                      • * flowerydreams *
                                                                        * flowerydreams *  18 hours back

                                                                        Vitamin d3 supplements can’t help against polio or measles, hun.

                                                                      • Whirlwind12 GMD
                                                                        Whirlwind12 GMD  20 hours back

                                                                        +A Gamer Thats not true, there is a higher chance of side effects than that, but still vaxx, its true, benefits > risk

                                                                      • Ese Callum
                                                                        Ese Callum  21 hours back

                                                                        +A Gamer where did you get that fihgure.whow was it arrived at.who calculated it?The Problem with Artificial Immunity (Vaccination)

                                                                        Since vaccines bypass your natural first-line defense (your lgA immune system), they are never 100 percent protective because they provide only temporary, typically inferior immunity compared to that your body would receive from naturally contracting and recovering from a disease.

                                                                        In the case of many childhood diseases, such as mumps for instance, immunity is typically permanent when you contract and recover from it in childhood. According to Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center:

                                                                        "Vaccines are supposed to fool your body's immune system into producing antibodies to resist viral and bacterial infection in the same way that actually having the disease usually produces immunity to future infection.

                                                                        But vaccines atypically introduce into the human body lab altered live viruses and killed bacteria along with chemicals, metals, drugs and other additives such as formaldehyde, aluminum, mercury, monosodium glutamate, sodium phosphate, phenoxyethanol, gelatin, sulfites, yeast protein, antibiotics as well as unknown amounts of RNA and DNA from animal and human cell tissue cultures.

                                                                        Whereas natural recovery from many infectious diseases usually stimulates lifetime immunity, vaccines only provide temporary protection and most vaccines require "booster" doses to extend vaccine-induced artificial immunity.

                                                                        The fact that manmade vaccines cannot replicate the body's natural experience with the disease is one of the key points of contention between those who insist that mankind cannot live without mass use of multiple vaccines and those who believe that mankind's biological integrity will be severely compromised by their continued use."

                                                                        So, is it really better to protect children against all infectious diseases early in life through inferior temporary immunity from vaccines? Wouldn't it be better for the majority of healthy children to experience certain contagious infections in childhood, especially if they are usually mild like chicken pox, and allow them to get more robust, longer lasting immunity?

                                                                        Another important question, from a vaccine policy standpoint, is whether or not vaccine complications ultimately cause more chronic illness and death than the infectious diseases do. Unfortunately, such investigations have not been done, but again, there is growing evidence that too much vaccination is leading to a deterioration in health in growing numbers of children and adults, who were otherwise healthy prior to receiving one or many different vaccines.

                                                                        Would You Knowingly Inject Yourself with Toxins?

                                                                        The main "active" ingredient in a vaccine is either killed bacteria or live viruses that have been attenuated (weakened). However, that's by no means the sole ingredient in vaccines. All vaccines also contain a variety of chemicals; some of which are more toxic than others.

                                                                        Most seasonal flu vaccines, for example, contain 25 mcg of mercury dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a vaccine preservative. Mercury is a known neurotoxin and thimerosal containing vaccines have been associated with long-term immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions. (Aluminum is another neurotoxin that is used in some vaccines as an adjuvant and has been associated with neurological problems such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia).

                                                                        Just imagine the potential brain damage you're exposing yourself to if you get a seasonal flu vaccine every single year!

                                                                        But thimerosal is not the only concern when it comes to flu vaccines. You also have the dangers of immune adjuvants like squalene or aluminum to contend with. (Aluminum adjuvants are used in approved U.S. influenza vaccines while other countries may allow squalene to be added as an adjuvant).

                                                                        Other toxic substances found in various vaccines include:

                                                                        Ethylene glycol (antifreeze)
                                                                        Triton X100 (detergent)
                                                                        Formaldehyde – a known cancer causing agent
                                                                        Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
                                                                        Neomycin and streptomycin (antibiotics)
                                                                        Phenol (carbolic acid)
                                                                        Aluminum -- a neurotoxin linked to Alzheimer's disease
                                                                        Polysorbate 80 (Tween80™) – which can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis

                                                                        (To determine which vaccines contain which ingredients, see this CDC list.)

                                                                        Personally, I don't think too many people would knowingly and voluntarily inject even one of these ingredients into their bodies. No, injecting detergent and antifreeze would seem ridiculous to most people, knowing how dangerous it can be swallow even a small amount of these caustic substances. And yet, every parent is asked, or even required by law, to repeatedly inject these and other toxic chemicals into their infants!